November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 26: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Decided) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Vote Recommendation: Yes''' | '''Vote Recommendation: Yes''' | ||
I was leaning "yes" on this one for a while, largely based on the idea that taxes are too high and spending needs to be curtailed. | |||
I finally decided to recommend a yes vote based on the observation that the Democratic Party recommended a no vote, and the Republican Party recommended a "yes". While I don't always vote along party lines, I found the difference enough to bolster my tentative analysis | |||
''See: [[November 2010 Election, California]]'' | ''See: [[November 2010 Election, California]]'' | ||
Latest revision as of 06:31, 23 September 2010
Vote Recommendation: Yes
I was leaning "yes" on this one for a while, largely based on the idea that taxes are too high and spending needs to be curtailed.
I finally decided to recommend a yes vote based on the observation that the Democratic Party recommended a no vote, and the Republican Party recommended a "yes". While I don't always vote along party lines, I found the difference enough to bolster my tentative analysis
See: November 2010 Election, California
Details
Increases Legislative Vote Requirement to Two-Thirds for State Levies and Charges. Imposes Additional Requirement for Voters to Approve Local Levies and Charges with Limited Exceptions.