John Curtis: Difference between revisions

From VoterGuide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added note/citation.)
(Added note/citation.)
Line 3: Line 3:
Our overall view of John Curtis is negative. Having run as a Democrat in 2000 strongly tarnishes his image. We do not think that anybody with a good head on their shoulders and solid conservative principles could join the Democratic Party without wrestling mightily against his conscience. One of our voting principles has always been "don't support a party platform you do not think is generally good" and the [[Democratic Party]] has never had a platform that we have recognized to be generally good. He has explained that he got the local party to change its platform to be acceptable to him so that he could give voters more conservative options, and elsewhere, that he was trying to bring conservative value to the Democratic party. This improves things, but his explanation still begs many questions. We are further concerned that he shows a disregard and disrespect for constitutional principles by taking advantage of [[Utah/Senate Bills/2014/54|SB 54]] to avoid the scrutiny of a caucus. That this is politically expedient, we do not deny, but it is bad form and further supports the idea that there is a deficiency in his principles. Although he can cite a couple of areas in which he aligns with conservatives, his overall behavior leaves us wondering what his core principles really are.
Our overall view of John Curtis is negative. Having run as a Democrat in 2000 strongly tarnishes his image. We do not think that anybody with a good head on their shoulders and solid conservative principles could join the Democratic Party without wrestling mightily against his conscience. One of our voting principles has always been "don't support a party platform you do not think is generally good" and the [[Democratic Party]] has never had a platform that we have recognized to be generally good. He has explained that he got the local party to change its platform to be acceptable to him so that he could give voters more conservative options, and elsewhere, that he was trying to bring conservative value to the Democratic party. This improves things, but his explanation still begs many questions. We are further concerned that he shows a disregard and disrespect for constitutional principles by taking advantage of [[Utah/Senate Bills/2014/54|SB 54]] to avoid the scrutiny of a caucus. That this is politically expedient, we do not deny, but it is bad form and further supports the idea that there is a deficiency in his principles. Although he can cite a couple of areas in which he aligns with conservatives, his overall behavior leaves us wondering what his core principles really are.


John Curtis has expressed, regarding the Trump/Russia investigation, that the new FBI director should continue to investigate independently.<ref>Lisa Riley Roche, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=45065881&nid=148&title=herrod-opposes-special-prosecutor-investigating-russia-trump-ties "Herrod opposes special prosecutor investigating Russia-Trump ties"], KSL, 18 Jul 2017</ref> His son, in May of 2017, reached out to an anti-Trump group called Utah Indivisible, in order to request their support for his father's 2017 congressional campaign.<ref>Jacob Dee Curtis, https://www.facebook.com/groups/411324352590429/permalink/518034451919418/, Facebook, 26 May 2017</ref> In July 2017, this group, apparently impressed with the un-conservative credentials of John Curtis, was encouraging their members to register as Republicans in order to manipulate the result of the primary.<ref>Travis Anna Hallstrom Harvey, https://www.facebook.com/groups/411324352590429/, Facebook, 31 Jul 2017</ref>
He ran for the Utah State Senate in 2000 as a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]].<ref>http://www.utahcounty.gov/dept/clerkaud/Elections/ElectRslts/2000_gen/INDEX.asp</ref>
 
John Curtis has expressed, regarding the Trump/Russia investigation, that the new FBI director should continue to investigate independently.<ref>Lisa Riley Roche, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=45065881&nid=148&title=herrod-opposes-special-prosecutor-investigating-russia-trump-ties "Herrod opposes special prosecutor investigating Russia-Trump ties"], KSL, 18 Jul 2017</ref> His son, in May of 2017, reached out to an anti-Trump group called Utah Indivisible, in order to request their support for his father's 2017 congressional campaign.<ref>Jacob Dee Curtis, https://www.facebook.com/groups/411324352590429/permalink/518034451919418/, Facebook, 26 May 2017</ref> In June 2017, John was asked about his possible affiliation with the Utah Indivisible group. No actual answer to this question was reported on. Instead, he ducked the question by providing his standard line regarding his 2000 campaign as a Democrat in 2000.<ref>Katie England, [http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/eight-gop-candidates-for-jason-chaffetz-s-seat-gather-for/article_9c392b54-f07a-51b4-a1ec-3db840d81057.html "Eight GOP candidates for Jason Chaffetz's seat gather for Q&A in Provo"], Herald Extra, 15 Jun 2017</ref> In July 2017, this group, apparently impressed with the un-conservative credentials of John Curtis, was encouraging their members to register as Republicans in order to manipulate the result of the primary.<ref>Travis Anna Hallstrom Harvey, https://www.facebook.com/groups/411324352590429/, Facebook, 31 Jul 2017</ref>


Curtis has been endorsed by [[Gary R. Herbert]].<ref>Lisa Riley Roche, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=45159792&nid=757&title=gov-gary-herbert-endorses-provo-mayor-john-curtis-in-3rd-district-race "Gov. Gary Herbert endorses Provo Mayor John Curtis in 3rd District race"], KSL, 25 Jul 2017</ref>
Curtis has been endorsed by [[Gary R. Herbert]].<ref>Lisa Riley Roche, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=45159792&nid=757&title=gov-gary-herbert-endorses-provo-mayor-john-curtis-in-3rd-district-race "Gov. Gary Herbert endorses Provo Mayor John Curtis in 3rd District race"], KSL, 25 Jul 2017</ref>


John Curtis used [[Utah/Senate Bills/2014/54|signature gathering]] to bypass party convention for his 2017 bid for a congressional seat.<ref>Ryan Morgan, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=44647745&nid=148 "11 GOP candidates hoping to win Chaffetz's seat gather in Lehi"], KSL, 14 Jun 2017</ref> He has explained that he did not think that he would get a fair shake in the caucus due to his history of having run as a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] against the [[Republican Party]] in 2000. He counters that he is a moderate who is anti-abortion and a supporter of gun rights and further that his principles haven't changed, but that he has simply chosen to apply his principles in different parties at different times.<ref>Courtney Tanner, [http://www.sltrib.com/home/5407172-155/provo-mayor-john-curtis-says-running "Provo Mayor John Curtis says running as a Democrat 20 years ago tarred him with many conservatives"], Salt Lake Tribune, 15 Jun 2017</ref> John's campaign website further explains that, concerned by the negative affects of party myopia, he got the region's Democratic party to change its platform and support him as a challenger to the Republican candidate.<ref>John Curtis, [https://www.johncurtis.org/blog/2017/6/3/questions-about-my-party-affiliation "Questions about my party affiliation"], John Curtis for U.S. Congress</ref> In a Twitter Q&amp;A, John said "tried bringing conservative principles to the Democratic Party and it was the wrong move. I learned a lot."<ref>Curtisut, [https://twitter.com/Curtisut/status/888074445759234048 "9:33 AM - 20 Jul 2017"], Twitter</ref>
John Curtis used [[Utah/Senate Bills/2014/54|signature gathering]] to bypass party convention for his 2017 bid for a congressional seat.<ref>Ryan Morgan, [http://www.ksl.com/?sid=44647745&nid=148 "11 GOP candidates hoping to win Chaffetz's seat gather in Lehi"], KSL, 14 Jun 2017</ref> He has explained that he did not think that he would get a fair shake in the caucus due to his history of having run as a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] against the [[Republican Party]] in 2000. He counters that he is a moderate who is anti-abortion and a supporter of gun rights and further that his principles haven't changed, but that he has simply chosen to apply his principles in different parties at different times.<ref>Courtney Tanner, [http://www.sltrib.com/home/5407172-155/provo-mayor-john-curtis-says-running "Provo Mayor John Curtis says running as a Democrat 20 years ago tarred him with many conservatives"], Salt Lake Tribune, 15 Jun 2017</ref> John's campaign website further explains that, concerned by the negative affects of party myopia, he got the region's Democratic party to change its platform and support him as a challenger to the Republican candidate.<ref>John Curtis, [https://www.johncurtis.org/blog/2017/6/3/questions-about-my-party-affiliation "Questions about my party affiliation"], John Curtis for U.S. Congress</ref> In a Twitter Q&amp;A, John said "tried bringing conservative principles to the Democratic Party and it was the wrong move. I learned a lot."<ref>Curtisut, [https://twitter.com/Curtisut/status/888074445759234048 "9:33 AM - 20 Jul 2017"], Twitter</ref>
He ran for the Utah State Senate in 2000 as a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]].<ref>http://www.utahcounty.gov/dept/clerkaud/Elections/ElectRslts/2000_gen/INDEX.asp</ref>


== External Resources ==
== External Resources ==

Revision as of 16:17, 3 August 2017

John Curtis is the mayor of Provo. He is running as a Republican candidate for the 3rd Congressional District seat in the November 2017 Election, Utah.

Our overall view of John Curtis is negative. Having run as a Democrat in 2000 strongly tarnishes his image. We do not think that anybody with a good head on their shoulders and solid conservative principles could join the Democratic Party without wrestling mightily against his conscience. One of our voting principles has always been "don't support a party platform you do not think is generally good" and the Democratic Party has never had a platform that we have recognized to be generally good. He has explained that he got the local party to change its platform to be acceptable to him so that he could give voters more conservative options, and elsewhere, that he was trying to bring conservative value to the Democratic party. This improves things, but his explanation still begs many questions. We are further concerned that he shows a disregard and disrespect for constitutional principles by taking advantage of SB 54 to avoid the scrutiny of a caucus. That this is politically expedient, we do not deny, but it is bad form and further supports the idea that there is a deficiency in his principles. Although he can cite a couple of areas in which he aligns with conservatives, his overall behavior leaves us wondering what his core principles really are.

He ran for the Utah State Senate in 2000 as a Democrat.[1]

John Curtis has expressed, regarding the Trump/Russia investigation, that the new FBI director should continue to investigate independently.[2] His son, in May of 2017, reached out to an anti-Trump group called Utah Indivisible, in order to request their support for his father's 2017 congressional campaign.[3] In June 2017, John was asked about his possible affiliation with the Utah Indivisible group. No actual answer to this question was reported on. Instead, he ducked the question by providing his standard line regarding his 2000 campaign as a Democrat in 2000.[4] In July 2017, this group, apparently impressed with the un-conservative credentials of John Curtis, was encouraging their members to register as Republicans in order to manipulate the result of the primary.[5]

Curtis has been endorsed by Gary R. Herbert.[6]

John Curtis used signature gathering to bypass party convention for his 2017 bid for a congressional seat.[7] He has explained that he did not think that he would get a fair shake in the caucus due to his history of having run as a Democrat against the Republican Party in 2000. He counters that he is a moderate who is anti-abortion and a supporter of gun rights and further that his principles haven't changed, but that he has simply chosen to apply his principles in different parties at different times.[8] John's campaign website further explains that, concerned by the negative affects of party myopia, he got the region's Democratic party to change its platform and support him as a challenger to the Republican candidate.[9] In a Twitter Q&A, John said "tried bringing conservative principles to the Democratic Party and it was the wrong move. I learned a lot."[10]

External Resources

References