Apple V FBI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Some Other Resources: Added resource.) |
(Added link.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''See other [[issues]].'' | |||
We side with Apple in saying that a judge has no authority to require them to write software for the FBI creating a backdoor to iPhones, even if just one iPhone. | We side with Apple in saying that a judge has no authority to require them to write software for the FBI creating a backdoor to iPhones, even if just one iPhone. | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 9 March 2016
See other issues.
We side with Apple in saying that a judge has no authority to require them to write software for the FBI creating a backdoor to iPhones, even if just one iPhone.
Some Other Resources
- "Tim Cook says FBI is asking Apple to write the software ‘equivalent of cancer’", Digital Trends, February 24, 2016
- "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says", FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016
- Daniel Kahn Gillmor, "One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case is Fraudulent", ACLU, MARCH 7, 2016