November 2010 Election, California: Difference between revisions
m (→California Supreme Court: Added period.) |
(→Ballot Measures: Adding positions) |
||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 22|Proposition 22]] | |[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 22|Proposition 22]] | ||
| | |Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 23|Proposition 23]] | |[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 23|Proposition 23]] | ||
| | |Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 24|Proposition 24]] | |[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 24|Proposition 24]] | ||
| | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 25|Proposition 25]] | |[[November 2010 Election, California, Proposition 25|Proposition 25]] | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 2 September 2010
Candidates
California Supreme Court
The California Supreme Court differs from other offices that go before the voters in that, voters are not asked to select who should fill an office, but are instead asked to confirm the Governer's nominees.
| Ming William Chin | Yes |
| Carlos R. Moreno | No |
| Tani Cantil-Sakauye | ... |
Ballot Measures
| - | |
| Proposition 19 | No |
| Proposition 20 | ... |
| Proposition 21 | ... |
| Proposition 22 | Yes |
| Proposition 23 | Yes |
| Proposition 24 | No |
| Proposition 25 | ... |
| Proposition 26 | ... |
| Proposition 27 | ... |
- Proposition 20
- Redistricting of Congressional Districts.
- Initiative Constitutional Amendment
- Proponent: Charles T. Munger, Jr. (See also: A related letter written by Munger) votersfirstactforcongress@gmail.com
Removes elected representatives from the process of establishing congressional districts and transfers that authority to the recently-authorized 14-member redistricting commission. Redistricting commission is comprised of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four voters registered with neither party. Requires that any newly-proposed district lines be approved by nine commissioners including three Democrats, three Republicans, and three from neither party. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Probably no significant change in state redistricting costs.
- Proposition 21
- Establishes $18 Annual Vehicle License Surcharge to Help Fund State Parks and Wildlife Programs and Grants Free Admission to All State Parks to Surcharged Vehicles.
- Initiative Statute
- Proponent: Joseph L. Caves (916) 558-1516
Establishes an $18 annual state vehicle license surcharge and grants free admission to all state parks to surcharged vehicles. Requires deposit of surcharge revenue in a new trust fund. Requires that trust funds be used solely to operate, maintain and repair the state park system, and to protect wildlife and natural resources. Exempts commercial vehicles, trailers and trailer coaches from the surcharge. Requires annual independent audit and review by citizen's oversight committee. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Increased state revenues of about $500 million annually from the imposition of a surcharge on the VLF to be used mainly to fund state parks and wildlife conservation programs. Potential state savings of up to approximately $200 million annually to the extent that the VLF surcharge revenues were used to reduce support from the General Fund and other special funds for parks and wildlife conservation programs. Reduction of about $50 million annually in state and local revenues from state park day-use fees. These revenue losses could potentially be offset by increases in other types of state park user fees and revenues.
- Proposition 22
- Prohibits the State from Taking Funds Used for Transportation or Local Government Projects and Services.
- Proposition 23
- Suspends Air Pollution Control Laws Requiring Major Polluters to Report and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions That Cause Global Warming Until Unemployment Drops Below Specified Level for Full Year.
- Proposition 24
- Repeals Recent Legislation That Would Allow Businesses to Carry Back Losses, Share Tax Credits, and Use a Sales-Based Income Calculation to Lower Taxable Income.
- Proposition 25
- Changes Legislative Vote Requirement to Pass a Budget from Two-Thirds to a Simple Majority. Retains Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Taxes.
- Proposition 26
- Increases Legislative Vote Requirement to Two-Thirds for State Levies and Charges. Imposes Additional Requirement for Voters to Approve Local Levies and Charges with Limited Exceptions.
- Proposition 27
- Eliminates State Commission on Redistricting. Consolidates Authority for Redistricting with Elected Representatives.
Counties
Los Angeles County, California
External Resources
- November 2, 2010, General Election Voter Guide - CA Secretary of State
- November 2, 2010, General Election - CA Secretary of State
- Election Results - June 8, 2010, Statewide Direct Primary - CA Secretary of State
- List of qualified run-off candidates for county and judicial offices.