Wikileaks: Difference between revisions

From VoterGuide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added resource.)
m (→‎Some Other Resources: Updated formatting.)
Line 4: Line 4:


== Some Other Resources ==
== Some Other Resources ==
* @wikileaks, [https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789493599121604609 8:48 AM - 21 Oct 2016], Twitter
* WikiLeaks (‏@wikileaks), [https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789493599121604609 8:48 AM - 21 Oct 2016], Twitter
* Tim Johnson, [http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article109255732.html "WikiLeaks claims sham U.S. firm is trying to smear Assange"], McClatchy DC, 19 Oct 2016
* Tim Johnson, [http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article109255732.html "WikiLeaks claims sham U.S. firm is trying to smear Assange"], McClatchy DC, 19 Oct 2016
* Liz Peek, [http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/19/wikileaks-reveals-obama-s-line-in-sand-won-t-believe-what-it-is.html "WikiLeaks reveals Obama’s line in the sand. You won’t believe what it is"], Fox News, 19 oct 2016
* Liz Peek, [http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/19/wikileaks-reveals-obama-s-line-in-sand-won-t-believe-what-it-is.html "WikiLeaks reveals Obama’s line in the sand. You won’t believe what it is"], Fox News, 19 oct 2016

Revision as of 15:40, 23 October 2016

See other issues.

They have done some great things, including the release of emails obtained form a hack of the Democratic Party, but they are irresponsible with their data.[1]

Some Other Resources

References