Apple V FBI: Difference between revisions

From VoterGuide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added link.)
(→‎Some Other Resources: Added resource.)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
* [http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/03/01/us-cannot-make-apple-provide-iphone-data-in-drug-case-ny-judge-says.html?intcmp=hpbt3 "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says"], FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016
* [http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/03/01/us-cannot-make-apple-provide-iphone-data-in-drug-case-ny-judge-says.html?intcmp=hpbt3 "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says"], FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor, [https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/one-fbis-major-claims-iphone-case-fraudulent "One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case is Fraudulent"], ACLU, MARCH 7, 2016
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor, [https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/one-fbis-major-claims-iphone-case-fraudulent "One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case is Fraudulent"], ACLU, MARCH 7, 2016
* Kevin Johnson and Jon Swartz, [http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/03/28/apple-justice-department-farook/82354040/ "Justice Depart. withdraws legal action against Apple over San Bernardino iPhone"], USA Today, 28 March 2016

Latest revision as of 23:02, 28 March 2016

See other issues.

We side with Apple in saying that a judge has no authority to require them to write software for the FBI creating a backdoor to iPhones, even if just one iPhone.

Some Other Resources