Apple V FBI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added stub text, and another resource.) |
(→Some Other Resources: Added resource.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/apple-encryption-court-order-news/ "Tim Cook says FBI is asking Apple to write the software ‘equivalent of cancer’"], Digital Trends, February 24, 2016 | * [http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/apple-encryption-court-order-news/ "Tim Cook says FBI is asking Apple to write the software ‘equivalent of cancer’"], Digital Trends, February 24, 2016 | ||
* [http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/03/01/us-cannot-make-apple-provide-iphone-data-in-drug-case-ny-judge-says.html?intcmp=hpbt3 "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says"], FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016 | * [http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/03/01/us-cannot-make-apple-provide-iphone-data-in-drug-case-ny-judge-says.html?intcmp=hpbt3 "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says"], FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016 | ||
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor, [https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/one-fbis-major-claims-iphone-case-fraudulent "One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case is Fraudulent"], ACLU, MARCH 7, 2016 | |||
Revision as of 15:14, 9 March 2016
We side with Apple in saying that a judge has no authority to require them to write software for the FBI creating a backdoor to iPhones, even if just one iPhone.
Some Other Resources
- "Tim Cook says FBI is asking Apple to write the software ‘equivalent of cancer’", Digital Trends, February 24, 2016
- "US cannot make Apple provide iPhone data in drug case, NY judge says", FoxNews.com, March 01, 2016
- Daniel Kahn Gillmor, "One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case is Fraudulent", ACLU, MARCH 7, 2016